A New Working Relationship for IT and the Contact Center

“Come gather ’round people, Wherever you roam…” Yes, folks. The times they are a-changin’ for contact center technology management. Here’s just a few of the reasons why:

  • IT has an increased burden on its time and resources driven by business needs… and most IT shops have not been able to staff up to handle the growing workload.
     
  • The center needs greater agility to respond to strategic, day-to-day, and “real-time” demands. They want to be more involved and want more control.
     
  • Technology stability and reliability issues force centers to insert themselves into technology support and management to ensure effective issue response and resolution as well as proactive problem avoidance.
     
  • Outsourced and hosted solutions add a new wrinkle to the IT-business relationship. The threat of “defection” increases IT’s eagerness to collaborate and find a way to meet everyone’s needs.
     
  • Technology support tools offer better ways to make changes without impacting core applications and systems.

new working relationship for IT and the contact centerWhether you are in IT/Telecom or hold a frontline leadership or support role in the contact center, it’s a new game with new roles to plan, implement, and support contact center technology effectively. It’s time to recognize those changes and work together to define processes and roles that will benefit the company and the customer.

Everybody wants – and needs – a voice in planning. Broad participation requires education through vendor forums, conferences and other events, webinars, papers, and more to make sure all the players know what’s possible with technology and what’s coming downstream. It also requires collaboration on strategic plans, tactical plans, budgets, requirements, and vendor evaluations.

While IT owns the core implementation roles (since it is technology, after all), contact center involvement continues to increase. Both support and line functions need to dive into the process. Implementation tasks include defining detailed requirements and specifications, and designing new ways to use technology (not just implement new technology doing the same old thing!). The contact center has a very important role in testing – functional, load, continuity/recovery, etc. – as well as piloting and refining, and defining and executing the best rollout strategy (across sites, groups, functions, etc.).

Support means more than troubleshooting. It also includes monitoring, ongoing testing, optimizing… and it again goes beyond IT. IT has the main role in the Network Operations Center (NOC), help desk, and operations support. But contact center support functions can now monitor performance, make changes (e.g., routing, prompts/messages, skills), create new reports and analysis, get involved in solving problems and making changes (whether technology-driven or business driven).

The launching point for tackling the organizational and process changes is a collaborative effort that defines roles/responsibilities and what works in your environment. Each company must define the nature of changes they are willing – or need – to make based on the issues they face today.

As a starting point for that exercise, I’d encourage you to read the full article that I wrote on this subject: IT and the Contact Center: Changing Together. Though change may be unsettling, I think your organization and the customers you support will be the better for it.

Posted in Organization | Leave a comment

7 Reasons to Consider Hosted Contact Center Solutions

SaaS, Hosted, Cloud-based…whatever we call it, contact centers are interested. This technology option offers flexibility, speed, innovation and reliability with low demands on human and financial resources for implementation and support. Market analysts report that cloud-based seats are growing faster than the overall market.

cloud-based contact centerHere are 7 reasons why more and more contact centers are considering cloud-based options:

  • New capabilities quickly – customers and management have expanded and changed their service expectations; contact centers need flexibility to keep pace
     
  • Competitive advantage – service innovation is a competitive weapon; cloud-based solutions offer competitive features/functions, especially for small to medium centers that didn’t think they could afford them
     
  • Economic downturn – contact centers need to grow, change, and expand services but must reduce their investment risk
     
  • Credibility – success of some hosted IVR, CRM and contact center vendors brings credibility to the whole market
     
  • IT resource constraints – every IT department has too much on its plate; decision makers like solutions that reduce internal resource requirements
     
  • Limited capital dollars – software and licenses are substantial capital investments; cloud-based services are operational costs (a preferred budget line item) and may confer savings
     
  • Open solutions – premise databases and applications can be integrated readily with a cloud-based infrastructure

For some of you, the transition from premise-based to cloud-based technology may be daunting. I’d encourage you to read Contact Centers in the Clouds: Expand Your Sourcing Options in which I cover several topics that bring out the strengths of cloud-based contact center technology while serving up a dose of caution. Collectively, they’ll help you ask the right questions as you entertain possibilities and plan your approach to implementation.

Cloud-based computing may not be the panacea for your center’s challenges. But with a clear understanding of the potential benefits and risks, you can feel comfortable adding a new set of providers to the list for consideration.

Posted in Cloud-based Computing | Leave a comment

It’s Time to Take Multi-Channel Technology Seriously

Multi-channel customer contact is not an option for today’s contact centers; it’s a necessity. Phone calls may still rule, but the alternatives to real-time voice are too numerous and significant to ignore or treat as second class.

Most centers handle each medium in distinct organizational siloes, informally. Few companies integrate channels or use sophisticated tools in contact routing and handling. Most have little to no reporting on media beyond phone calls, and what data they have isn’t used for staffing and planning. This approach might “work” for small volumes with good people making up for bad technology and/or processes. But it’s not scalable or sustainable if:

  • Marketing start pushing alternative channels
  • Web self-service become so commonplace that it generates lots of email and/or chat requests
  • Workforce planners strain to find staff suitable for each medium
  • Customer satisfaction decrease due to inconsistent treatment and/or quality across media
  • The voice platform hit end-of-life and trigger a need to consider multi-channel platforms

These changes cry out for a technology change!

Start by looking at available technology to stimulate your thinking about what is possible and what you should consider. Understand the functionality and its benefits. For example…

A multimedia routing and reporting engine will provide a common framework for the administration of agent profiles, skills, and routing rules. As you apply those routing rules, the ability to trigger logic based on what is happening with all media queues and agent skills and availability will optimize resource utilization as well as responsiveness to customer needs.

multichannel routing engine

You gain a more credible story as a “contact center” leader or support resource as your integrated reporting lets you present performance across media. Accurate insights into agent utilization and time in work states lets you really manage your most valuable (and expensive) asset.

The data generated feeds into and integrates with performance tools – e.g., workforce management, quality monitoring, analytics, voice of the customer. And common knowledge management tools provide consistent answers to questions regardless of channels.

With those considerations in mind, it’s time to think about how to get there. Consider all possibilities for sourcing: premise or hosted, suite or “best of breed,” CTI-like solutions for external multi-channel routing. Use technology replacement as an incentive to change processes, not just technology. And as you define your path, consider the impact your new multi-channel environment will have on your adjunct systems (performance tools, CTI, KM, CRM, etc.) as you expand media under consideration.

Read Multi-Channel Technology Comes into Its Own to get some ideas on where and how to start.

Posted in Multi-channel Customer Contact | Leave a comment

The Value of Technology Assessment and Planning

Technology projects are on the rise. There’s pent up demand and “end of life” threats on existing systems. It’s tempting to move fast to get something done. But that’s not optimal for making careful and thoughtful decisions. I’d suggest that you use a structured process to reduce risk and enable you to achieve your goals without needlessly hindering your quest.

A formal assessment and planning process pursues the appropriate technology to fill your requirement gaps without buying more (or less!) than you need. It secures solutions that fit into your overall technology environment while delivering business value.

contact center technology assessment process

Conducting a discovery process helps your team understand your center and its business and technology situation as well as the external world and what it has to offer. Start by developing a thorough understanding of your current technology environment. Then envision the possibilities by gaining knowledge of the industry, the contact center marketplace, your competition, and industry leaders.

In the analysis & assessment phase, you’ll take the list of current technology and go deeper to understand how the technology is applied today. You should uncover ways that you could more effectively apply what you already have and identify the gaps to fill, the options to fill them, and the tradeoffs for each option. Part of your analysis should also include other success factors for effective application, integration, procurement, implementation, and support.

Define and develop the end state or vision. Make sure that you have synchronized your business, operations, and technology strategies. Suggest technology models that may be appropriate and recognize the risks and how you will mitigate them. Define a vision for architecture, sourcing, infrastructure, applications, integration, and support that will meet your goals. Define the implementation approach including phases. Complete any financial analysis required for project approval.

Document and validate all aspects of the plan, including the vision, required actions, budget submittal, and project phasing and timing. Capture sufficient detail for plan approval, but make sure that the whole team knows the “elevator story” – that is, the high level messaging to capture the interest and attention of key executives.

That’s a really quick overview of the process. If I’ve whet your appetite, I highly recommend that you read the full article.

Posted in Technology, Vendor Selection | Leave a comment

What’s On Your Radar for 2012?

With no shortage of projects vying for your attention, I thought I’d sift through the noise and highlight four areas that merit serious consideration in the New Year.

radarMultimedia Routing and Reporting: For over 10 years, we’ve been talking about multimedia silos and the myriad of challenges they present for contact centers. It’s time to break down the silos and manage multimedia contacts holistically.

Desktop Optimization: Messy, clunky, non-integrated applications drag down agent efficiency and ability to serve customers in excellence. Yet “cleaning up” the desktop isn’t just about integrating different systems. With desktop analytics, you’ll be able to see what people are doing (or not doing), what works (or doesn’t work), where you’ve got performance issues, and where compliance problems arise, to name a few.

Knowledge Management and Wikis: These technologies provide agents with access to a wealth of accurate, approved, consistent, readily available knowledge at their fingertips. Customers could tap into some or all of these repositories as well.

Reporting and Analysis: A long as you are in the contact center business, you will be tasked with creating meaning out of data and leveraging the insights you glean. The more your center grows and changes, the greater the need to address analytics.

For a more detailed discussion, check out the full article (What’s On Your Radar for 2012?) in the Resources section of our website. In the meantime, here’s a summary table to help you start thinking about how you might move forward with these possibilities. There’s no time like the present!

 

Technology Opportunity Options
Multimedia Routing and Reporting (MMRR) Blended multimedia routing engine
Blended multimedia reporting engine
Common administrative tool
ACD vendors for their multimedia routing and reporting engines (e.g., Avaya, Cisco, Genesys, Aspect, Interactive Intelligence)
Third parties with MMRR that integrate with your systems
Desktop Integration, Analytics, and Collaboration Consolidated desktop application integration into existing systems
Desktop analytics capturing events and time in systems, applications
Desktop collaboration tools to communicate internally and/or with customers
Vendors focused on desktop improvement (e.g., Jacada, OpenSpan, Cicero)
Performance tool vendors for desktop analytics (e.g., Verint, Nice, Aspect)
“Unified Communications” vendors
Niche vendors with targeted applications (e.g., LiveLOOK)
Knowledge Management and Wikis Shared and updated information across internal resources (center and across enterprise)
Shared and updated information with customers for self service
KM modules that are part of CRM solutions (e.g., via Oracle, SAP, SalesForce.com)
Wikis (e.g., via SocialText, PBWiki/PBWorks)
Microsoft SharePoint 2010
Reporting and Analytics Improved reporting for specific systems, media, applications
Scorecards/dashboards leveraging information from various systems
Analytics tools (speech, text, data, desktop)
Existing system vendors
Performance tool vendors for analytics (e.g., Verint, Nice, Aspect)
Niche vendors (e.g., Nexidia, HardMetrics)
Posted in Analytics, Consolidated Desktop, Multi-channel Customer Contact, Wikis | Leave a comment

The Contact Center as a Police State?

We have had PCI compliance as part of the discussion in many of our projects over the last few years, focused on the technology requirements for data protection and vendor’s abilities to comply. However, we recently heard an unusual – I hope – situation that raised concerns for me.

A client who is undergoing a PCI audit and working on compliance strategies discussed the issues they are addressing, which go way beyond technology. Some of the examples the auditors have suggested include:

  • pci complianceRaise cube walls
  • Wall off areas of the center where agents handle credit cards
  • Badge agents with different colors based on access levels
  • Transfer calls when a credit card number needs to be taken to a “locked down” group solely for that purpose
  • Other concerns such as how to handle remote service observing, use of outsourcers, and home agents are entering the discussion

I believe these types of things could have a significant impact on our industry – both centers and customers – if they proliferate. Longer handle times, physical facility changes, stricter and more involved hiring and training, greater skills segmentation, and the risk of not being able to use alternative sourcing strategies all could have significant impact on contact center costs, without commensurate benefits. These changes seem to not address the real risks, and could divert scare time, money, and resources from higher value initiatives. In addition, such changes impact the customer with greater “level of effort,” more transfers, and longer contact times – all potential dissatisfiers in an era when everyone is focused on optimizing the customer experience and minimizing level of effort.

Is this situation an anomaly triggered by overzealous auditors or lawyers, or an indicator of things to come as companies get more serious and the standards “mature?” I don’t believe (nor does the client) that such changes or restrictions inherently reduce the risk of compromising information such as credit card numbers. I am not a PCI expert by any measure, but from what I’ve read, I can’t see that the standards dictate such measures. In checking with a few of my respected and similarly experienced colleagues in the industry, I found they too have experienced companies raising their zealousness about these types of changes, as well as more cumbersome authentication procedures (even when the IVR has already successfully done that!). I also found they agree with my level of concern and suspicion that the changes don’t achieve net positive results. At the same time, we see some companies heading down these paths without critically evaluating the costs, benefits, and risk reduction.

And here’s the kicker – when I did get to a security expert through one of the other contact center industry gurus I know, the reaction was strong: These examples are extreme and concern themselves with the wrong issue. While such changes might help reduce the risk for an individual action on a few pieces of data, they do nothing to address the real concern behind PCI and other regulations: Avoid theft of millions of records. I’ll add my two cents to that perspective: Even with those changes, short of strip searches of agents coming and going, you can’t really count on such measures to prevent even the theft of a few records.

The good news is we may be early in the evolution of these changes. Now is the time to carefully assess these types of actions and balance the realities of contact center operation and delivering a good customer experience with complying with data protection. Systems, policies, processes and procedures, monitoring and reinforcement seem like stronger tools in the fight to keep data secure.

What do you think? Have you got some PCI or HIPAA examples to share? Let us know if you’ve run into similar issues and can you share any perspectives on it. If you’ve had an audit, let us know the types of changes that result.

Posted in PCI | Leave a comment

7 Keys to Effective Multichannel Customer Contact Governance

Multichannel customer contact is a fact of life. Unfortunately, so are organizational silos and divided ownership of the media that your customers use, or want to use.  In an increasingly complex customer interaction environment, there’s no time like the present to get your corporate act together.

Start with a discovery process that takes inventory of the ways customers currently interact for various contact types, as well as the technology in place to enable these interactions. Gather the critical business drivers that the strategy must consider, along with the elements of corporate strategy and operational goals that will influence channel priorities.

Assemble a cross-functional task force to establish a vision for multichannel. Use the inventory to identify gaps, assess requirements, and surface dependencies. Prioritize initiatives to define a plan and timeline. Assess the impact on your people, process, and technology as well as your customers.

In a perfect world, the task force presents a cohesive multichannel strategy and plan to a cross-functional steering committee that assumes the mantle for making intelligent investments and monitoring business impact. They can get (and keep) everyone on the same page, working together toward common goals. They’ll ensure that the appropriate “connective tissue” gets put in place for end-to-end service delivery and hold the responsible parties accountable for results.

An effective multichannel governance structure demands focused attention to the following critical success factors:

  1. Visible endorsement and support by senior management to champion the strategy, build coalitions to support it, and create the desire for change
     
  2. Representation from all stakeholders to establish a broad base of support, leverage distinct perspectives, institute peer review, and promote the initiatives across the organization
     
  3. Understanding of and allegiance to common goals and vision
     
  4. Documented policies and procedures that govern project submission, evaluation, rating/ranking, approval, monitoring, and post-implementation assessment
     
  5. Oversight of investments and resource allocation across all customer contact channels
     
  6. Performance management to measure tangible contributions to business goals
     
  7. A formal change management process to overcome resistance and dramatically increase the likelihood that projects will succeed

A carefully constructed strategy, an effective governing body, and the right foundational tools make it possible to optimize the customer experience while delivering on the organization’s business objectives.

For a more detailed discussion on this topic, read the full article entitled Pursue Strategy and Governance to Ensure Multichannel Technology Optimization.

Posted in Multi-channel Customer Contact | Leave a comment

5 Essentials for Effective Contact Center Technology Support

There’s no doubt about it. Contact center technology has gotten much more sophisticated. It offers a whole gamut of features and functions that we wouldn’t have thought possible years ago. But it’s also more difficult to create the same degree of stability and reliability that we used to enjoy with the old telecom systems.

Here are 5 things every contact center should do.

  1. Start with a base of good technology design – from diverse trunking to high-availability systems to dual-hub architectures. The right design provides the “built in” redundancy and resiliency that mission-critical centers need. Define standards against which you can assess current and future systems. Identify gaps that can be remedied or captured as known risks. Track risks against failure rates to see which ones should command management attention.
    contact center technology support
  2. Keep a finger on the pulse of your technology’s performance through monitoring and health checks. The right tools and processes lead to early detection and reaction to issues before they have too great an impact.
     
  3. Establish proper governance of technology change management processes. Adherence to define processes ensures that implementation teams don’t shortchange technology review and approval processes and appropriate testing by both IT and Users – even when under great pressure to meet deadlines.
     
  4. Set up restoration and repair processes to ensure speedy recovery of down systems and application. Complement your processes with properly staffed and trained resources within the company and with vendors. Provide the appropriate tools to capture, diagnose, and solve problems quickly.
     
  5. Tie all of the above together with ongoing analysis, communication, and optimization. Analysts can learn from architecture and risk information, outcomes of testing and monitoring, and the details of incident management. They can then share what they learned and drive continuous improvement.
     

If what I’ve suggested peaks your interest, I’ve written a whole article on this subject. Check out Keys to Success in Supporting Today’s Contact Center Technology.

Posted in Support | Leave a comment

Will IVR Ever Win Our Hearts?

Whenever I tell people that I’m in the call center business, I brace myself for a diatribe about “those darn systems” real people too often hide behind. Without fail, an Interactive Voice Response system (IVR) takes center stage. It doesn’t have to be this way.

can ivr win our heartsImagine a world where the response from your new acquaintance is to regale you with stories about cool and wonderful experiences with voice interactions. Companies have stopped wasting time and money on bad applications and instead leverage the technology to optimize customer interactions and corporate outcomes.

Here are six key innovations that have the potential to turn this imaginary world into reality.

1.     Call steering and caller identification
IVR has long had a role in identifying who is calling and why, but with improved integration, personalization, intelligent interfaces, it can be a concierge: something a customer chooses to use. Customers willingly provide a bit of information to get what they want, knowing it’s necessary and worthwhile to quickly guide them onto the right path for their needs.

2.     Personalization and customization
Building on the concierge analogy, this approach captures preferences, past usage patterns, customer information and status along with logic in the application to present appropriate choices and guidance. Customers experience simplified menus, receive relevant updates, and only go down paths that make sense given their relationship and status.

3.     Improved interface
Companies can offer better and fewer applications (the RIGHT ones) because so many other good channels exist. The IVR is basically freed of the burden of trying to do it all. Moreover, data and speech analytics reveal what’s working and what’s not, and help identify opportunities for tuning applications and interfaces. Judicious use of speech recognition, text-to-speech, and voice recognition further enhance application delivery.

4.     Architectural changes
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) holds the promise of easier integration of customer data with the phone contact. While we’ve been able to pop screens at an agent desktop based on IVR-entered information for 25 years, we still have a long way to go to get everyone to use it. Perhaps now that it’s “easy,” it can become commonplace. And with IVR systems increasingly able to use the same mechanism to tap data and applications as web or other interfaces, IT can build and maintain system interfaces in one place and use them in different settings.

5.     Outbound notification and alerts
IVR can serve as an outbound dialer – whether connecting people to people, or delivering automated messages with options to confirm, take other action, and/or speak to someone. When notifications and alerts are personalized and customized, they truly offer a “wow” factor for customers and can preempt more expensive or less timely inbound contacts for the company.

6.     And now for something completely different
Imagine that you’re interacting with an automated interface and you get stuck. You need someone to guide you to the right place in the application or help you with an answer. Just when you’re ready to throw in the towel, an agent comes on the line to sort things out. He is part of a team that works in concert with the IVR to help customers be successful. You might still need to talk to a live agent, but in most situations the “automated” application will succeed because it’s got a human behind it to help out when needed.

Interested in learning more? Read my September article in Contact Center Pipeline entitled Not Your Mother’s IVR.

Posted in IVR | Leave a comment

Enabling Technology for Multi-channel Customer Contact

In a world of expanding customer contact channels and the departmental silos that go with them, is it possible to optimize the customer experience and deliver on business objectives? The answer can be a resounding “YES!” given a carefully constructed multi-channel strategy, an effective governing body, and the right people, processes, and technologies to support them.

multi-channel foundational technologiesThree foundational technologies serve as the “glue” to create a consistent framework for service delivery and channel management: Customer Relationship Management (CRM), Knowledge Management (KM) or Wikis, and cross-channel analytics. They serve three critical business objectives:

  • Knowing who your customers are so that you can tailor your products, services, and channels to their collective and individual needs
     
  • Delivering information about your organization and its products and services accurately, efficiently, and consistently for internal and external consumption
     
  • Managing all of your customer contact channels as an integrated whole to optimize both the customer experience and operational costs

CRM is the centralized repository of information that records detailed information about customers – who they are, what they prefer, the business units and channels with which they interact, and the inquiries or transactions they’ve pursued. It provides a consistent window into the customer relationship no matter which business unit or channel they engage.

KM captures, manages, and shares information. KM solutions mine repositories (databases, document libraries, intranets, extranets, websites) in response to natural language queries and provide tools to add new information and insights. They’re adept at managing the organization’s intellectual assets as well as “tribal knowledge.” Solutions built to realize in-house efficiencies can be extended to web self-service with appropriate screening, filtering, and security provisions.

Wikis can be a faster, lower cost alternative to KM solutions. They’re collaborative, web-based applications that equip nontechnical users to create and edit any number of interlinked web pages using simple text editors. What they lack in capacity for mining existing repositories they gain in speed of information capture, organization, and presentation.

Cross-channel analytics is the discipline of measuring, analyzing, and fine-tuning the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of customer service delivery across all customer-facing channels. It traces customer paths within channels, across channels, and across time as they complete (or attempt to complete) transactions and assesses what’s working and not working by channel and across channels. [Read my post on Selection Criteria for Cross-channel Analytics!]

While responsibility for managing customer-facing channels may reside in different departments, customers should experience the organization as an integrated whole. Technology can be an enabler for delivering consistent treatment across all points of contact. But it requires forethought and planning to ensure that the critical technologies for service delivery are accessible across the organization and work together seamlessly.

Before you get too far down the road of building out your technology infrastructure and applications, get a cross-functional team together to set multi-channel goals and identify the tools necessary to meet them. Establish a process for evaluating technology investments against a strategic view of customer contact, not the individual department or channel owner’s needs. In the end, it will serve all of their interests.

Posted in Multi-channel Customer Contact | Leave a comment